As two-thirds of American voters oppose the Supreme Court giving corporations greater freedom to spend on elections, the JOURNAL takes a hard look at how campaign cash in judicial elections may sway America's courts.

As two-thirds of American voters oppose the Supreme Courts decision in Citizens United v. FEC, BILL MOYERS JOURNAL takes a hard look at how campaign cash in judicial races may sway America's courts. The JOURNAL revisits the 1999 FRONTLINE special, "Justice for Sale," which looked at the growing concern - even among Supreme Court justices themselves - that campaign contributions may be corrupting the judicial process. Then, Bill Moyers sits down with legal analyst and journalist Jeffrey Toobin to talk about the relationship between big money and judicial elections today.